Elections Office Undertakes Voluntary Recount of Crye Recall Votes

All votes for and against Supervisor Kevin Crye’s recall are being voluntarily added in to the usual 1% manual tally process. An official recount by the request of any party is still a possibility in future.

Assistant County Clerk and Registrar of Voters Joanna Francescut speaks to a member of the public during a hand recount of recall votes. Photo by Annelise Pierce.

Today, Monday March 18, votes for and against Supervisor Kevin Crye’s recall are undergoing a hand recount at the Elections Office. The decision to recount recall votes was made by the Elections Office, Assistant County Clerk and Registrar of Voters Joanna Francescut says. 

“When I made this decision on the 12th it was based on how close the race was,” Francescut explained. “I think at that time it was thirty-nine votes apart and now it’s forty-six.”

This elective hand recount by the Elections Office doesn’t rule out another recount being undertaken at the request of either Supervisor Kevin Crye or recall supporters, Francescut said. A request to recount votes can be made by any party within five days of the results of the vote being certified, something which will occur on or before April 2.

Votes for and against the recall are being counted alongside ballots included in the 1% manual tally.

A recount in response to an outside request would be paid for by the requesting party, Francescut confirmed, and is a “more intense process.” 

“That (specific) recount process allows observers to be a little bit more on top (of the ballot counters),” She explained. “You can see how we have boundaries in place right now . . . with the (official) recount process observers can be standing right on top (of the ballot counters) and verifying the ballots . . . and they also have different rights to challenge different ballots.”

Elections staff participate in a hand count of recall ballots. Photo by Annelise Pierce.

Francescut said she sees voluntarily hand recounting as an excellent way to confirm the results of machine counting especially in close races. “When a contest is really close,” Francescut explained, “we have the ability to add the count into the manual tally.”

“We’re doing this just to help ensure and just give us 100% confidence that the machines accurately counted votes,” Francescut continued. “So like, again, the hand count (done) with the machine count is a really great way to audit and so we use this as a valuable tool.”

“Hand counting is a great audit tool,” she continued. “It’s something that we need to have in our back pocket when elections are tight. Hand counting with machine counting is what makes the elections secure, it helps that verification.” 

This is a relatively simple hand counting process, Francescut explained, because it’s a yes/no vote meaning elections staff have to look at only four possible results from each ballot they count, a yes vote, a no vote, an overcount where both responses were filled in by the voter, or an undercount where neither response was filled. 

Elections staff engaged in the recount in several small groups on the ground floor of the Shasta County Elections Office on Market Street. They counted by precinct, beginning each count with the precinct number before announcing each type of vote followed by a count of all ballots with that vote.

YouTube video thumbnail

By mid-morning Monday, Francescut said she had not yet looked at current time studies to determine exactly how long the hand count, which involves examining about 9,000 ballots, would take. She says she expects to post results online as they emerge with some early results likely emerging soon.

“We’re just going to see how quickly we get through this,” Francescut said, “before we determine if we’re going to add additional contests into this process as well.”

A total of six election observers from the public showed up to watch parts of the recount between 9-11:30 am Monday morning. Supervisor Patrick Jones was among them.

Elections results will become official once certified. If Crye is recalled, he will leave office following official certification. If he’s not recalled, he’ll remain in office through the rest of his term, which ends December 2026.

This article was updated with video at 5 pm on March 18. Have questions, concerns, or comments you’d like to share with us directly? Reach out: editor@shastascout.org. 

Through December 31, NewsMatch is matching donations dollar-for-dollar up to $18,000, giving us the chance to double that amount for local journalism in Shasta County. Don't wait — the time to give is now!

Support Scout, and multiply your gift

Author

Annelise Pierce is Shasta Scout’s Editor and a Community Reporter covering government accountability, civic engagement, and local religious and political movements.

Comments (5)
  1. Thanks Scout for the update.

  2. During the election, the media and the ROV seemed to be very staunch on making sure that there was NO hand counting based on Gavin’s new law specifically for Shasta county. Why now does the voter registration office want to hand count, when it was so wrong 3 weeks ago. maybe they’re finally seeing how easy, cheap and TRANSPARENT it truly is to hand count! Seems like they’re trying to justify their hand counting now because it’s a close race. It was always logical to check the machines, but anyone who said that before was criminalized by the ROV and you the media. Go back and reread what the ROV said, and what you wrote.

    • Dian: The ROV’s office has always hand counted a percentage of ballots as this is required under state law. They’ve also traditionally added additional ballots to the percentage required when races are close as they did this time with the Crye recall.

  3. Great Reporting once again. Thank you

  4. This event might counter misinformation about our elections. We do vote on paper ballots. And they are saved throughout the election process. Our vote is not isolated on a computer disk. The machine scans our paper ballot just like the checker at Safeway scans your groceries. It is quick and accurate. To be sure, the office is required to hand count 1% of the total ballots. That hand count should match the results from the scan machine. If there is a mismatch, the office determines the cause. In Shasta County history, mismatches are rare and promptly solved. Imagine hand counting thousands of ballot, where each ballot has multiple contests and many response options. Many opportunities for honest mistakes. Having scanning machines and then double-checking with a hand count sample is fast and accurate. As good a system as fallible mankind can devise.

Comments are closed.

Until Dec. 31, all donations will be doubled, and new donations will be matched 12x.
Thanks for putting the COMMUNITY in community news.

Close the CTA

In your inbox every weekday morning.

Close the CTA

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING!

FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA

Find Shasta Scout on all of your favorite platforms, including Instagram and Nextdoor.