Meet Don Aust for the Shasta County Board of Education
Former superintendent and long-time educator Don Aust is running for a four-year term on the Shasta County Board of Education. After many years of engaging with SCOE’s programming and guidance in Shasta County’s rural school districts, Aust sees participating on the Board as his opportunity to give back.

Don Aust is running for a four-year seat in Area 2. He’s one of five candidates competing for two four-year seats in that Area. Candidate responses to seven questions have been curated and paraphrased for this format. A note that four candidates declined to interview with Shasta Scout about their run for the SCOE Board: Richard Gallardo, Michele Renee Tyson, Teresa Roberts, and Jackie LaBarbera.
Scout: Describe your background and what motivated you to run for the SCOE Board.
I was a teacher and administrator for 30 years, 29 of those here in Shasta County. For the last 16 years I was a superintendent principal up in Black Butte school in Shingletown. I retired about three years ago and since then I’ve been helping with my grandkids. My adult children work in the educational field just like I did.
When I saw that there was an opening on the SCOE Board I decided I have the time to give back. I’ve always been in small rural districts here in Shasta County and SCOE is very supportive to small school districts, providing training for administrators like myself. During my time at Black Butte school, if I ever had a question, I could call anybody at SCOE for some advice. They also gave a lot of training for my staff. So I’d just like an opportunity to give back. I really want to see that SCOE continues to help serve the small districts, especially in Area 2, because most of those are very small rural districts.
Education is complicated. There is LCAP (Local Control Accountability Plan), special education, transportation, food service, passing bonds. It’s all a lot of work. These smaller districts have to work together and need SCOE’s support, and that’s what I would want to see continue. At times, big grants become available and it’s impossible for a small school district to jump on that and do it themselves.
When I was an administrator, I could have spent my whole day in my office doing paperwork but I didn’t. I spent my evenings in my office doing paperwork because during the day I wanted to be out with students. It’s all about the students.
Scout: What is the Shasta County Office of Education responsible for?
I don’t know if they’re responsible for it, but they certainly give a lot of support to small school districts. As I said before, they provide training and a lot of collaboration between the districts. Their main responsibility is watching over school districts’ budgets, just to make sure they’re spending correctly. They don’t dictate how you spend your money, but you have to send your budget to them, and your LCAP to them so that they can give final approval–which guides how you’re going to prioritize your funding.
I think for me, that was sort of a minor part of what they did. The support that they gave was just invaluable. It was the only way I made it 16 years as a superintendent, or as a principal of a small school, because it’s just too complicated to do everything that a big district like L.A. Unified does, and yet we have to follow the same state regulations. It’s almost impossible for a superintendent or principal, with limited resources, to keep up on all of that.
Scout: What oversight does SCOE have over individual school districts?
The Board has no authority over policy for any district in the county, but a lot of people seem to think that they do. When it comes to school policy they have no authority whatsoever.
When I was a superintendent, if a parent or a community member didn’t like a decision that I made, at times they would tell me, “well, I’m going to the SCOE Board to get this changed!” Good luck. SCOE can’t tell districts what to do. That is a real misconception. It sort of surprises me that there’s so many people running for the SCOE Board, because individual school district boards have much more power.
Scout: How do the Board’s responsibilities differ from individual school boards?
Individual school districts have a lot more students. SCOE actually has very few student programs that they run directly: the court school, special education, and preschool. So it’s a very limited number of students. The local school districts have more students and more power. For example, they can hire and fire the superintendent. At SCOE the superintendent is an elected position.
Scout: Have you received donations of over $1,000 and if so from what groups or organizations?
No, I’ve received no funding from any group.
Editor’s note: Shasta Scout reviewed Aust’s campaign finances via the Shasta County Elections Office and found no contributions documented as of October 4.
Scout: Discuss your thoughts on public education in Shasta County.
I 100% support public schools because the end game is that they’re supposed to represent all students. I’ve been in Redding for over 30 years. I raised my kids here. They all went to public schools in Redding, went on to college, got their masters. One is a certified librarian, and one’s a school psychologist, both here in Redding. I’ve been helping with my grandkids, volunteering at their school since I retired three years ago. They’re doing just great in school, and I’m impressed by what I’ve seen with their teachers. When I was a superintendent, we would go and visit schools, visit classrooms, see how their instruction was. I was always very impressed with what I saw, by the dedicated teachers and administrators really trying hard to do what they could for all of their students. I think that it’s sort of unique in Shasta County that even though we compete for students, we all cooperate and collaborate very well. Our main goal is that we want the best for students.
Scout: What are your thoughts on “Parents’ Rights?”
I mean, I get that you’d want to know about your student. I want to know about my kids. But this term is currently being defined pretty narrowly, and it’s referencing a very small minority of situations (at least here in Shasta County) that policy might have an impact on. I know there’s a lot of talk about teaching kids, I don’t know what you call it, “wokeness.” And I’ll tell you what, I never saw it at my school district or in the schools I visited. It just was not a big issue. I don’t see that kind of stuff happening, at least here in Shasta County. So I think that people maybe are making too big a deal out of these issues here. Maybe it’s in the Bay Area, and I knew there was an issue in Chico, but I certainly have not witnessed that happening here.
I have my own personal beliefs, but I have no political agenda. When I was a superintendent, I never brought my personal beliefs forward. We never discussed politics. We just discussed how to run our school district. I think that’s how it should be, because we are representing all students and all parents, no matter whether they’re Democrat, Independent, Republican, I don’t care. I just want to do the best I can for all of the students in that community. I have nothing I’m trying to prove with politics. I just want to run programs that help students.
Have a correction to share? Email us: editor@shastascout.org.
Comments (7)
Comments are closed.
I believe the idiom “powers that be” mischaracterizes this situation and undermines the hard work we’ve put in over the past two years. It’s not about unseen forces favoring certain candidates; it’s about dedicated individuals actively working to keep divisive political agendas out of our schools. This commitment to protecting our students and community has put us in a strong position to be elected.
Frank’s comment was respecting Mr. Aust and has experience in education while so noting the very important fact that an additional candidate was similar beliefs could cause a split amongst votes that could inadvertently cause an extremist to win a position on this board which could be detrimental to our community.
Hi Jessica: You and Aust are running for the same open seats . . . I’m just noting that you and Orlicky have been promoted in various places whereas Aust has not, for whatever reason.
I hope my explanations helps explain why.
Mr. Aust is certainly an upstanding gentleman, had his time working in schools, but does not seem to know what’s happening in the school culture of today. The term ‘woke agenda’ has many meanings from different segments of a community. Don’t confuse this with parental right’s that Mom’s For Liberty are trying to foist illegally on parents as per CA Education Code and CA laws. Parents have all kinds of rights for their students and Mom’s For Liberty groups knows this; they just want to challenge and break the CA laws under which we all live. Their political agenda is to make sure LGBTQ+ students are outed without their permission; and their are many LGBTQ+ students in the Shasta Co. school system that need protection from bullying and outing without their permission. I’m concerned that Mr. Aust wasn’t fully aware who is pushing the real agenda here, when it’s clear that it’s Mom’s For Liberty and not the so-called left wing CTA.
And remember there are only 2 seats for Area 2, SCOE and 6 candidates running. One is an Appt. Incumbent-Amy Cavalieri with Board of Trustee experience and the other is Jessica French who has children in the district and is a Director of a non-profit that brings students from abroad to learn about our school system in America. Both highly qualified. Mr. Aust could be the spoiler here and allow one of the extremist candidates to win, factor that in when you vote.
Frank: I think what you’re trying to say is that some powers that be have decided French and Cavalieri are the favored picks over Aust despite his similar perspectives. It’s interesting to observe.
Thank you Shasta Scout. When a open, transparent and free media provides this quality of information voters stand to let facts affect their choices, not conspiracy based balloney. Fact strengthens democracy and the American way of live and I hope empirical based fact is recognized by all as the foundation of education.
Mr. Aust is a standup guy and with my limited interactions in the past years, he has always been super fair and on the spot at school. My daughter attended Black Butte, and at the time, he had an excellent staff of educators there. I have no doubt he would do fantastic at this job. I am also also absolutely positive if there was a “woke agenda” He would certainly be paying attention at its effects on his students. I believe he stands for much greater purposes with the education of students than some political agenda infused by the liberal left teacher unions! Shasta county would do well with Mr. Aust