New Shasta results show margins for Francescut, Resner, Gallagher increasing, Measure B’s decreasing
The vote totals are still far from complete, about 30,000 of the county’s estimate of 58,000 ballots — also a moving target — still remain to be counted.
Shasta’s latest election results include an additional approximately 5,500 ballots that were processed today.
Those results show a 2% increase in former Assistant Registrar of Voters Joanna Francescut’s lead over current Registrar of Voters Clint Curtis. She now has 58.11% of the vote for Shasta’s county clerk role.
Redding Council member Erin Resner is also improving her margin for the Shasta County District 1 supervisor seat. Her top competitor is Supervisor Kevin Crye. She currently has 55.35% of the vote, an increase of almost 2%.
Anderson City Council member Mike Gallagher’s vote totals increased by about 1%, to 49.51% of the vote. He’s running for Shasta County’s District 5 supervisor seat against Supervisor Chris Kelstrom, who has 40.81%.
If Francescut and Resner hold their leads, they’ll secure their races in the primary without needing to go to a run-off this fall. Gallagher has not yet reached the critical 50% plus one needed to avoid a fall run-off with Kelstrom.
Meanwhile Measure B, a controversial ballot initiative that appears illegal to implement under current state and federal laws, has lost some of its early margin of success. Yes votes are currently at 53.64%, that’s a decrease of 2%.
Votes from about 28,500 ballots have been counted for the June 2 election so far. Approximately 30,000 remain to be counted, according to an estimate shared by Shasta election official Clint Curtis earlier today.
Do you have a correction to share? Email us: editor@shastascout.org.
Author
Comments (9)
Leave a comment
Related Articles
Close to 35,000 ballots remain to be processed in Shasta. New vote totals are expected today
Combined with the number of ballots already processed, the uncounted ballot estimate indicates an overall turnout of about 58,000 registered voters in this election. All ballots must be initially processed by end of day June 8, election official Clint Curtis said, to meet a June 11 state deadline.
Shasta County must race to meet election certification deadline of June 11
Due to the special election for California’s District 1 congressional representative, which is on the same ballot as the regular statewide primary elections, Shasta County must meet an earlier deadline to certify at least some election results.
After opposing bipartisan collaboration, conservative candidate Darin Hale trails in race for California Assembly
Hale, who currently sits on the Anderson City Council, ran for state assembly with a promise to be a hardliner when it comes to the needs of rural Californians, accusing incumbent Assembly member Heather Hadwick of making too many concessions to Democrats.
Nice way to truncate a sentence to fit your need, but courts do not look at things thru a knothole in search of loopholes. Read the sentence again, more completely: “…majority of all the ballots cast for candidates for that office…” It does not just say “ballots cast” and end right there where you want it to. Rather, it says: “…ballots cast for candidates for that office…” as the operative phrase. The only ballots counted in each race are those cast for the respective candidates in that race, and no others. Your point is this moot
5500 hundred votes in two days? What an embarassment. If this had happened under Cathy Darling Allen, the local election-fabulist fruitcakes would be losing their minds. I hope the state people have stayed around to document this cluster.
Selah
Definitely trending in the right direction for the sane law-abiding candidates. However, since Curtis and his Conspiracy friendly C team is in charge, we’ll have to wait until sometime next week before we get any answers. What an embarrassing, pathetic, pitiful performance.
Keep the cameras rolling and the power on!
Election Code § 8140: “Any candidate for a nonpartisan office who at a primary election receives votes on a majority of all the ballots cast for candidates for that office shall be elected to that office.”
“Ballots cast” is an interesting phrase. The legislature could have said simply “votes counted” but they didn’t. About 10% of Shasta County voters leave blank down ballot contests like for county supervisor (in 2024, 1,779 District 3 voters left their ballot blank compared to 17,157 who voted).
Perhaps Curtis and/or Crye will challenge their losses based on this legal ambiguity and advance to the general election anyway.
Darwish…. I don’t know how else to say it but your guys are losing….
.
And frankly that’s good for Shasta County.
My in-person vote is still missing. Mr. Curtis called me back after I reported the problem. My vote has not even been accepted on Ballottrax. Curtis tried to just tell me that my vote had been counted if I voted in person. I have asked him to prove it. Someone was supposed to get back to me but, crickets.
Burney VFW was my polling place.
A similar thing happened to me. I went down to the office and demanded they checked their system to see if my ballot was reviewed and recorde, as Ballotrrax indicated that even after 2 and 1/2 days my vote had not been counted.
.
The person that helped me. Was very nice, and very friendly. After getting permission she was able to access the system and indeed, it showed my ballot was received and recorded. The next day it finally showed up on Ballotrrax. You might have to go down to the office and get this straightened out.
Did you drop off your vote by mail ballot in the return envelope or did you cast a precinct ballot and put it in the bksck ballot box?
I thought Curtis said they would be counting approximately 14,000 ballots a day which would make them done after Monday’s count. 5,000 more ballots added to the total today means his estimate fell short on the this first day by 9,000 votes. Not only can he not do the job, but the poor guy is bad at basic math too.