‘A very, very difficult transition’: Kings View to end mental health services in Shasta, citing HHSA contract delays
Kings View says it has absorbed hundreds of thousands of dollars in lost payments due to the county’s delays in contract execution over recent years. The county’s Health and Human Services Agency said it has paid all “contracted eligible expenses.”

The nonprofit Kings View, which serves clients in 23 counties across the state, is ending its services in Shasta. The decision comes, Kings View leaders say, after another delay in the nonprofit’s most recent contract process with Shasta County’s Health and Human Services Agency.
Kings View has been serving about 120 mental health clients in Shasta through two programs operating on behalf of HHSA’s Behavioral Health branch. Its first contract with Shasta began in 2018.
Over the last six years, the 75-year old nonprofit says it’s faced repeated challenges in Shasta when it comes to both timely contracts and getting reimbursed for services that were provided to clients during gaps in between contracts.
A few weeks ago, Kings View learned that it would likely experience another prolonged gap in its contract with HHSA. That was the point at which the organization reluctantly decided to stop providing services in Shasta, Kings View Communications Director Beverly Raine said this week.
Publicly available Shasta County documentation confirms Kings View’s claims about contract gaps, but is not detailed enough to verify whether or not those gaps created financial losses for the nonprofit.
In a series of statements yesterday and today, HHSA said the county had “paid for all contracted eligible expenses for Kings View” with the exception of the most recent June invoice, adding that it would need additional information to determine whether financial losses had been incurred by the agency during gaps in contracts.
Kings View’s contract with the county ended June 30. The nonprofit said it’s currently in the process of handing off clients and closing up its Redding-based wellness center.
Some impacted clients pose a risk to both themselves and the community
About 20 of Kings View’s Shasta clients are enrolled in a state-mandated program known as Assisted Outpatient Treatment or AOT which provides court-ordered community treatment under what’s known as Laura’s Law. The legislation, which was signed into law in California in 2002, is named after Laura Wilcox, a 19-year old mental health clinic volunteer who was killed by someone with severe mental illness in 2001.
Under Laura’s law, individuals qualify for AOT if they have a serious mental illness that has resulted in either incarceration, psychiatric hospitalization or violent behavior towards themselves or others within the last several years. It’s specifically intended to reduce the risk of harm from individuals who experience what’s known as “anosognosia,” or a lack of awareness of their mental illness.
The program does not force the use of medications but does provide support to assist with both medication access and use, along with other needs. California counties which have implemented AOT have reported significant cost savings through reduced hospitalization, incarceration, and homelessness, all of which are prevalent issues in Shasta.
Kings View Clinical Officer Marilyn Sliney said a team of four nonprofit staffers have been working with Shasta AOT clients to meet their significant support needs in ways intended to protect both the clients’ wellbeing and the broader community’s safety.
“They are mostly referred through the court system,” Sliney said. “These are people who are at very high risk, very high need. The AOT program helps to keep them safe and increases the safety of the community, by helping them to manage their pretty severe mental health diagnoses.”
AOT is just one of two programs that the nonprofit has been running in Shasta. The other, Sunrise Mountain Wellness Center, located off Hilltop Drive in Redding, has been providing a variety of holistic mental health support services to about 100 clients each month, regardless of income level or insurance. Walk-in clients have been able to receive free lunches, transportation, peer mentoring and access to a number of social activities and behavioral health classes that provided them with stability, engagement and care.
The nonprofit says it operated the two programs interdependently in Shasta, using a shared building and regional director to provide cost efficiencies. Both programs were funded by the state’s Mental Health Services Act, which was replaced by the Behavioral Health Services Act this year.
Updated requirements under BHSA have meant changes are necessary in how the wellness center is operated in order to allow it to continue to qualify for state funding through the county. It’s a similar challenge to that being faced by Hill Country Community Clinic’s program in Burney, which has also been receiving MHSA funding for a wellness center through a contract with HHSA.
In interviews this week, Kings View staffers said last November was when the two nonprofits began engaging in discussions with the county about how to evolve wellness center programming to comply with new funding rules as they came into effect mid-year. The changes require more evidence-based programming, Sliney said, something Kings View was prepared to offer under a “clubhouse” model that can be funded through a subset of BHSA known as BH-Connect.
HHSA confirmed many of those statements, saying RFPs for the clubhouse model were awarded to both Kings View and Hill Country in May to facilitate new funding for community services under BHSA guidelines. Kings View’s latest contract ended June 30, and the organization has been awaiting execution of a new contract.
Issues occurred when Kings View learned only a few weeks ago that the county was not prepared to enter into a new contract for months, perhaps six months or more, leaving a substantial gap between when the current contract ended and when a new one might be executed.
The nonprofit says it can’t absorb the cost of maintaining staff during a prolonged contract delay. And without the cost efficiencies from the wellness center, the nonprofit says, it also cannot afford to continue to provide AOT services under a new contract this year. As a result, the nonprofit is ending both services in Shasta.
Sliney called the decision a “very, very difficult transition for Kings View to make,” saying while the organization is committed to providing services to individuals in need and has a special passion for the work in Shasta, it’s clear that the nonprofit’s work here cannot continue, at least not under these circumstances.
“Unfortunately, as much as we are mission-driven, we are also an organization that has fiscal responsibilities,” Sliney explained, “and sadly there have been instances historically where there’s been a gap in contract [with HHSA] and some of those instances we were not able to be reimbursed for any of those costs in that gap.”
She said the county’s initial discussions with Kings View this May indicated that September was a likely start date for the new clubhouse model. That was workable, Sliney said, explaining that Kings View was willing to continue paying staff costs for the wellness center over that time period, despite knowing that those costs would never be reimbursed. It wasn’t until the organization learned a few weeks ago that the earliest date for execution would likely not be until January that a decision to withdraw from Shasta was made.
Kings View Communications Director Raine explained it this way.
“Kingsview is a nonprofit organization, so we have to be stewards of our budgets and our revenues and it was just more money than we could agree to absorb,” Raine said.
In response to questions from a reporter, HHSA said the agency had paid “all contracted eligible expenses” through May adding that it was unable to speak to the specific issue of financial losses without additional data.
HHSA added that both Kings View and Hill Country were informed that executing a contract could take three to six months or longer, “depending on the process of negotiations.” Asked why executing the contract with Kings View would take months to accomplish, HHSA shared that “in general, a three-month duration is a reasonable and typical time frame to execute a contract,” adding that a “typical contract” could take six months. Sliney said HHSA has told the nonprofit that the contract delay was due to the county’s need to continue sorting out issues related to state funding.
Moving forward, HHSA confirmed for Shasta Scout that it will be serving the needs of AOT clients in-house. The agency said it tentatively planned to hire between 2-4 staff to meet AOT needs, and would be planning to fill those roles within the coming months.
“The County is working closely with Kings View to transition clients into HHSA’s care while maintaining continuity of services and minimizing disruption,” HHSA Administrative Branch Director Erin Watts said.
In an interview yesterday, Kings View staffers expressed deep concern for the clients the nonprofit has been serving in Shasta, especially those in the state-mandated Assisted Outpatient Treatment program or AOT, whose care is intended to prevent harm.
Sliney described the Kings View AOT team as always out in the community wherever patients are staying, helping them to manage their emotional regulation, mental health impacts and need for resources — including food, shelter and clinical treatment. She said it’s a level of care that’s imperative to ensure not only their wellbeing but also community safety.
“They have to be supported and served” Sliney said, “or there is going to be increased emergency services, hospital visits, or physical or safety issues involved.”
Kings View had similar concerns for wellness center clients, expressing worries that they won’t be connected with the resources and human connection they need to stay stable. HHSA responded by saying that the agency’s Peer Support Program “provides similar assistance,” adding that a peer support specialist is available to youth and adults regardless of their insurance provider.
Moe Shimizu contributed reporting for this story.
Do you have a correction to share? Email us: editor@shastascout.org.
Comments (22)
Comments are closed.

This was not personal but a business decision. Marilyn Sliney bad mouthing others is less than professional. I hope she realizes that future employers would not be impressed.
I read your comment and then re-read the entire article, focusing on Marilyn Sliney’s remarks. I didn’t see any statement that was unprofessional. Can you elaborate on your comment?
Kings View is not entitled to a government handout to keep operating. There are other better run organizations in Redding.
Name one. Name a few.
Kings View, another poorly run nonprofit closes. This is almost cliché.
Tim: The nonprofit didn’t close. It’s been around for 75 years and continues to operate in almost two dozen counties across California. What happened is that it’s no longer contracting with Shasta County.
It’s hard to understand why Shasta County would allow an essential service provider’s contract to lapse in order to save money.
This seems to be grossly unethical.
The community benefits by having people with mental health problems treated and monitored.
County HHSA has been operating with concerning questions of competency as demonstrated by County Medical Officer’s not staying in the position and by questionable financial management!
HHSA should not be an agency whose services are subject to political diatribes or financial manipulations. Can they deliver in house?
Larry,
Perhaps you should do a fundraiser to help pay for it. Also, you could be an unpaid volunteer at the local homeless shelter. These are good ways you can help.
There is an apparent oddity in the realm of nonprofit entities in California (if not all across the United States): They are obsessed with money. They seek lucrative contracts for this and that–if you can think of this and that etcetera, you can find a nonprofit championing it. Why? Well, each is a business of a sort. Some–very few–seek only the revenue to do what the nonprofit states it wants to do and does, However, the vast majority of nonprofits are created to provide income to the creator of the non-profit and, if the revenue stream and the mandatory work requires and allows, for the directors of the board–the creator is typically the chairman of the board–as well as any skilled employees that are required. (Yes, even a decades-old nonprofit can be passed down.) At least one commenter requests that Shasta Scout inquire if Kings View is under investigation for improprieties by the State of California. I will make a somewhat easier-to-satisfy request of Shasta Scout: Examine the IRS Form 990 for those Kings View members whose compensation must be reported. The information is online.
Thanks to Crye and his buddies on the board making poor management appointments to HHSA department, Shasta County is a mental health desert. We had a chance to make progress but Crye called the proposed mental health facility evil. The damage he has done will take decades to repair.
The real reason Kings View is leaving has to do with their poor track record of service and financial mismanagement. I understand that they are the subject of a state investigation. Annelise, please confirm with the California Department of Public Health.
Lisa: If this is true, why did Shasta County plan to continue to use Kings View for AOT services under BHSA funding? https://www.shastacounty.gov/media/81681
The County’s contracts process is unnecessarily unwieldy. It’s only made worse by shortages in county counsel and incompetence by agency leadership.
This is a travesty! One step forward 10 steps back for this County!
I’m with you Marci. All these programs we supported and got established in this county are folding. The outcomes will be devastating for those participating in these programs. We have gone backwards in the last few years in this county in the area of mental health and substance use. It’s a travesty.
Mary perhaps your support for numerous left wing causes led to your reelection loss. Next time spend more time on rural issues and less time on the justice involved.
Interesting to see that the non-profit’s assets grew to over $33M over several years. I think they’ll be ok. Money more important than service decision?
https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/941412648
It is not Kings View that is losing out. It is, again, Shasta County and the incompetence at the higher levels which has exasperated problems in many departments. As per the article: HHSA said the agency had paid “all contracted eligible expenses”. So there it is. We pay when we have a contract. No contract > No pay or they must spend time clawing back what is rightly owed to them. This county is penny wise, pound foolish and it has and is and will be costing the constituents well into the future.
Interesting that a former accountant(?) would omit the fact that their liabilities (the other half of a balance sheet) also increased by a corresponding percentage, leaving NET assets at $14.4M.
Also glossed over was the fact that their sources of income from contributions has consistantly been at least double that of “program services,” negating the implication that they are getting rich off of contracts with 28 different counties. It is thus clear that this organization could not survive solely on County contract income.
Revenue $60,386,787
Expenses $57,159,087
Net Income $3,227,700
Net Assets $14,402,612
Notable Sources of Revenue
Percent of Total Revenue Contributions $41,811,698 69.2%
Program Services 18,198,347 30.1%
I love facts!
Made me look – posted financials are 6/30/25 which makes sense because the 6/30/26 wouldn’t be audited yet. $33m assets seems like a lot but could be a symptom of the problem. Of that $33m, $13m is A/R and we’d have to assume much of that is due from the county. There is $6m in cash but their A/P and salaries payable is $6.3m, ouch. The $11m in fixed assets/leases to serve 23 counties seems reasonable. Their admin expense to overall expense is outrageously low at 11%. FYI, I don’t know anything about this org other than I know a little bit about the painful financial troubles when trying to contract with the county
This is inexcusable. It sounds like this level of carelessness and incompetence have been standard procedure. Where is the oversight? Is county counsel part of the problem? What in the world is going on?